WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Aviation Administration said on Tuesday it had convened a multi-agency Technical Advisory Board to review Boeing’s proposed software fix on the grounded 737 MAX.
The board consists of experts from the FAA, U.S. Air Force, NASA and Volpe National Transportation Systems Center that were not involved in any aspect of the Boeing 737 MAX certification. The board’s recommendations will “directly inform the FAA’s decision concerning the 737 MAX fleet’s safe return to service.”
The plane was grounded worldwide in mid-March after two Boeing 737 MAX crashes in October and March killed 346 people.
Boeing, which has yet to formally submit the software fix to the FAA for approval, did not immediately comment Tuesday on the new review.
Some in Congress have urged the FAA to conduct an independent review into the anti-stall system at the center of investigations into two deadly plane crashes before allowing the planes to resume flying.
The board known as TAB will assess Boeing’s proposed fix to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), the FAA said.
“The TAB is charged with evaluating Boeing and FAA efforts related to Boeing’s software update and its integration into the 737 MAX flight control system. The TAB will identify issues where further investigation is required prior to FAA approval of the design change,” the FAA said.
The world’s largest planemaker, facing its worst crisis in years and the worldwide grounding of its top-selling jetliner, has said its software upgrade and associated pilot training will add layers of protection to prevent erroneous data from triggering MCAS.
The system activated in the Ethiopian Airlines crash in March and also during a separate Lion Air crash in Indonesia in October.
There are a number of other reviews ongoing, including a blue-ribbon committee appointed by Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao looking at the FAA’s aircraft certification process.
Federal prosecutors, the Transportation Department’s inspector general and lawmakers are investigating the FAA’s certification of the 737 MAX 8 aircraft.
A separate joint review by 10 governmental air regulators started last week and is expected to last about 90 days, but the FAA has said that a decision on ungrounding the plane is not contingent on that review being completed.
(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Nick Zieminski)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao said on Monday she named four experts to a blue-ribbon committee to review the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) aircraft certification process after two deadly Boeing 737 MAX crashes killed nearly 350 people.
Chao said she was naming NASA’s former aviation safety program director Amy Pritchett and Gretchen Haskins, chief executive of HeliOffshore Ltd, an international expert in aviation safety and a former U.S. Air Force officer.
She also named Kenneth Hylander, chief safety officer at Amtrak and a former senior safety executive at Delta and Northwest airlines, and J. David Grizzle, chairman of the board of Republic Airways and a former FAA chief counsel.
The committee is “specifically tasked to review the 737 MAX 800 certification process from 2012 to 2017, and recommend improvements to the certification process.”
U.S. lawmakers have criticized the FAA’s program that allows Boeing Co and other manufacturers to oversee the process that ensures air worthiness and other vital safety aspects of new aircraft.
Chao said last month the panel would be co-chaired by retired Air Force General Darren McDew, the former head of the U.S. Transportation Command, and Lee Moak, a former president of the Air Line Pilots Association.
Federal prosecutors, the Transportation Department’s inspector general and lawmakers are investigating the FAA’s certification of the 737 MAX 8 aircraft. A joint review by 10 governmental air regulators is also set to start April 29.
(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Tom Brown)
FILE PHOTO: A United Express Embraer ERJ-175LR airplane is pictured at Vancouver’s international airport in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, February 5, 2019. REUTERS/Ben Nelms
(Reuters) – United Airlines on Tuesday reported a better-than-expected jump in first-quarter profit as it sold more tickets and cut costs, standing by its 2019 profit target even as its Boeing Co 737 MAX jets remain grounded.
Chicago-based United has removed its 14 MAX aircraft, which were suspended worldwide in March following two fatal crashes, from its flying schedule through early July, eating into U.S. airlines’ peak summer travel season.
Still, the airline’s parent United Continental Holdings Inc reiterated its estimate for adjusted earnings of $10 to $12 per share in 2019, and said its strategy for scheduling more flights out of its hubs was continuing to win customers.
Adjusted earnings per share rose to $1.15 in the first quarter, ending March 31, from 49 cents a year earlier, overcoming a U.S. government shutdown and severe winter weather earlier this year that curtailed flights.
Wall Street analysts on average had forecast 95 cents per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.
Its shares rose 2.8 percent in after-hours trading.
United has largely avoided cancelling MAX flights by servicing those routes with larger aircraft, but President Scott Kirby warned last week that the strategy could not last indefinitely.
The airline, which has been adding seats at a faster pace than rivals, trimmed its 2019 capacity growth target to between 4 percent and 5 percent from 4 percent to 6 percent previously, but did not say whether the decision reflected the effect of the grounded MAX.
Total operating revenue rose 7.1 percent to $8.73 billion in the quarter, while closely watched revenue per available seat mile rose 1.1 percent.
In the second quarter, United said it expects unit revenue to rise between 0.5 percent and 2.5 percent while unit costs, which fell 1.8 percent in the first quarter, were expected to be flat to 1 percent higher.
The No. 3 U.S. carrier is the first of three U.S. 737 MAX operators to report first-quarter results. Southwest Airlines Co and American Airlines Group Inc, which have removed their MAX jets from schedules into August, report on April 25 and April 26 respectively.
A Federal Aviation Administration review board said on Tuesday that it found a Boeing software update for the MAX to be “operationally suitable,” suggesting the lengthy regulatory process to get the planes back in the air was underway.
Rival Delta Air Lines Inc, which does not operate the 737 MAX, lifted its 2019 revenue forecast last week after reporting better-than-expected quarterly profit.
(Reporting by Tracy Rucinski in Chicago; Additional reporting by Sanjana Shivdas in Bengaluru; Editing by Bill Rigby)
FILE PHOTO – The logo of Australian casino giant Crown Resorts Ltd adorns the hotel and casino complex in Melbourne, Australia, June 13, 2017. REUTERS/Jason Reed/File Picture
(Reuters)
– Wynn Resorts Ltd, the world’s No. 2 casino operator, said on Tuesday
it scrapped preliminary talks to acquire Crown Resorts Ltd for A$10
billion ($7.1 billion), after the Australian Financial Review broke news
of the negotiations.
Wynn’s
backtracking illustrates how media leaks of deal talks can test the
resolve of potential acquirers. Crown shares jumped as much as 22
percent on the news to A$14.37, close to the $A14.75 per share level
that Crown said Wynn’s latest cash-and-stock offer valued the company.
This
can make deal negotiations more difficult by emboldening acquisition
targets to drive a hard bargain, analysts said. In this case, Wynn’s
inexperience with pursuing big deals also likely played a factor, some
analysts added.
“(Wynn)
management’s experience with acquisitions is limited, so when you
target synergies it’ll be nice to have more of a track record for such a
large transaction,” said Roth Capital Partners analyst David Bain,
calling the termination of the deal talks a positive development for
Wynn.
After
the Australian Financial Review revealed Wynn’s takeover approach,
Crown not only confirmed the confidential talks on Tuesday, but also
disclosed the price that Wynn was offering. It added that Crown’s board
had not yet considered Wynn’s latest offer.
Wynn then issued two statements, first confirming the talks, and, a few hours later, stating that they had ended.
“Following
the premature disclosure of preliminary discussions, Wynn Resorts has
terminated all discussions with Crown Resorts concerning any
transaction,” the company said in a statement.
Wynn’s shares were down 3.2 percent at $140.21 in New York at mid-afternoon.
Examples
of companies confirming acquisition talks only to back out hours later
are few and far between, because they reflect a lack of conviction on
the part of the aspiring acquirers.
Last
year, drug maker Allergan Plc confirmed it was in the early stages of
making an offer for peer Shire Plc, after Reuters broke news of the
deliberations, only to issue a second statement a few hours later
stating it would not make an offer.
Insurer
Aon Plc said last month it would not pursue a merger with rival
insurance brokerage Willis Towers Watson Plc, a day after it confirmed
it was in early stages of considering an all-stock offer for the Irish
company following a Bloomberg News report revealing the deliberations.
HEDGE AGAINST MACAU
Wynn
was founded in 2002 by Steve Wynn, who started his casino business in
Las Vegas in the 1960s and created some of the city’s most iconic
landmarks – the Mirage, Bellagio and Treasure Island – before selling
them. Beset by sexual misconduct allegations, Wynn left the company and
sold his entire 11.8 percent stake in Wynn Resorts for $2.1 billion last
month.
Wynn
operates large resort-and-casino complexes in Las Vegas and Chinese
gambling hub Macau, with another under construction in Massachusetts.
The deal would have offered a hedge against Macau, where its licences
are up for renewal, by giving it two lavishly revamped Australian
casinos and a third being built on the prized Sydney harbour front.
Buying
Crown would also fit in with Wynn’s strategy to diversify
geographically to protect its growth prospects if its Macau licences are
not renewed.
The
company’s efforts so far have included ramping up promotion of a resort
in Japan, a market seen as the next potential goldmine to Macau and a
former expansion target for Crown.
“Wynn
has typically grown through building their own facilities, not through
acquisition,” said Bain, the Roth Capital Partners analyst.
For
Crown’s 47 percent owner James Packer, who re-badged his father’s media
empire as a gambling concern in 2007 only to withdraw from business
engagements last year due to mental illness, the deal would have ended
his career as a casino mogul with a A$4.7 billion payout.
He
would have ended up as Wynn’s biggest shareholder with 9.8 percent of
its shares, based on its current number of shares on issue.
“We
think Wynn’s strategy was mostly defensive, but if they have a strong
strategic rationale for wanting to acquire Crown, they would likely come
back to the table when things settle down,” said John DeCree, Union
Gaming Securities’ director of North America research.
(Reporting by Byron Kaye, Tom Westbrook and Paulina Duran in SYDNEY, Devika Syamnath and Nivedita Balu in BENGALURU, and Greg Roumeliotis in NEW YORK; Editing by Sriraj Kalluvila, Shounak Dasgupta and Richard Chang)
(Nattee Chalermtiragool/Shutterstock)
stock-Wynn-Macau-01-shutter
Macao, China – March 12, 2016: View of Macao city at night in Macao, China
